After generating a hypothesis, a scientist next:

One of the legacies of the Apollo program is the concept of late heavy bombardment or a lunar cataclysm that may have resurfaced the Moon and thermally metamorphosed its crust.

After generating a hypothesis, a scientist ..

But the one constant that the progressives desire is change for the sake of change.

After generating a hypothesis, a scientist next..

Truth. It’s natural to think that computability, range of application,and other things being equal, true theories are better than falseones, good approximations are better than bad ones, and highlyprobable theoretical claims are better than less probable ones. Oneway to decide whether a theory or a theoretical claim is true, closeto the truth, or acceptably probable is to derive predictions from itand use observational data to evaluate them. Hypothetico-Deductive(HD) confirmation theorists propose that observational evidence arguesfor the truth of theories whose deductive consequences it verifies,and against those whose consequences it falsifies (Popper 1959,32–34). But laws and theoretical generalization seldom if everentail observational predictions unless they are conjoined with one ormore auxiliary hypotheses taken from the theory they belong to. Whenthe prediction turns to be false, HD has trouble explaining which ofthe conjuncts is to blame. If a theory entails a true prediction, itwill continue to do so in conjunction with arbitrarily selectedirrelevant claims. HD has trouble explaining why the predictiondoesn’t confirm the irrelevancies along with the theory ofinterest.

After generating a hypothesis, a ..

Typical responses to this question maintain that the acceptability oftheoretical claims depends upon whether they are true (approximatelytrue, probable, or significantly more probable than their competitors)or whether they “save” observable phenomena. They then tryto explain how observational data argue for or against the possessionof one or more of these virtues.

At itsbest, however, there is only one absolute truth: that there are no absolutetruths.

When is it necessary for a scientists to do research

It does not get the independent variable.
What is an Experimental Group?
The group that get the independent variable to see how it
affects or changes

something or not.
What is a variable?
A variable is something that can
change
, either naturally or on purpose.
Independent variable
The factor that the scientist has changed (on purpose) in order to test the hypothesis .

only after a hypothesis is written C

Life Lessons Science is an ongoing process, as scientific investigations provide evidence that can either support or contradict a hypothesis.

A hypothesis can be replaced by a new or modified hypothesis after further investigation.

Thus, scientists are always prepared to modify their understandings of the natural world.

The belief that there is only one reality can itself be subjectedto scientific scrutiny.

3,137 is a prime and the next one after that is ..

One answer to this question assumes that observation is a perceptualprocess so that to observe is to look at, listen to, touch, taste, orsmell something, attending to details of the resulting perceptualexperience. Observers may have the good fortune to obtain usefulperceptual evidence simply by noticing what’s going on around them,but in many cases they must arrange and manipulate things to produceinformative perceptible results. In either case, observation sentencesdescribe perceptions or things perceived.

Brad Bailey NLSI Staff Scientist August 3, 2009 I have a question concerning a comet that will pass by Earth in the year 2029.

The claim that a social scientist is "biased" is rarely ..

Recently, planetary scientists detected hydrated salts on these slopes at Hale crater, corroborating their original hypothesis that the streaks are indeed formed by liquid water.

The goal is to make an observationthat conclusively disproves one or more of the competing theories.

Start studying Bio Exam 1 Practice

Scientific methods are used in physical, life, and earth sciences.

Scientists carefully choose the setting for an investigation, such as the field or a laboratory.

Scientists may use models when studying things that are very large, small, or complex.