Can You Prove A Theory To Be True? - MyRSC

The scientific method does not allow any hypothesis to be proven. Hypotheses can be disproven in which case that hypothesis is rejected as false.

What Is a Scientific Hypothesis? | Definition of Hypothesis

To be scientific, theories can never be proven true, but all theories must be refutable.

Answer to 1) (i) You can prove a hypothesis

These theories can be taught in schools as philosophy or religion, but they must not be taught as science, unless the instructor uses them to demonstrate to the class what is and what is not science.

and try to prove your hypothesis is true

Her hypothesis is that nitrogen will increase grain production, and because the hypothesis must be subject to refutation, her alternative hypothesis is that nitrogen will not increase grain production.

Remember, hypotheses can not be proven true, but they can be disproved.

Can Cosmology Prove or Disprove Creation? | BQO

The intuition is partly true. For the sets of real numbers which we can define by a reasonably simple way we can also prove that the continuum hypothesis is true: every "simply" describable uncountable set is of the size of the continuum.

Yes, Running Can Make You High - The New York Times

During a test, the scientist may try to prove or disprove just the null hypothesis or test both the null and the alternative hypothesis. If a hypothesis specifies a certain direction, it is called one-tailed hypothesis. This means that the scientist believes that the outcome will be either with effect or without effect. When a hypothesis is created with no prediction to the outcome, it is called a two-tailed hypothesis because there are two possible outcomes. The outcome could be with effect or without effect, but until the testing is complete, there is no way of knowing which outcome it will be, according to the .

To test hypotheses about the risk of biotech crops to human health, the hypotheses must be subject to testing and refutation.

A hypothesis can be proven true.? | Yahoo Answers

Like electrons, no one has ever seen gravity, but because of the scientific method of supporting or refuting hypotheses about gravity, there is overwhelming evidence that gravity exists.

Based on your answer in (a), would the null hypothesis that the true mean is $50,000 be continued or rejected at the 5% significance level?

HYPOTHESIS is the answer you think you'll find

CORRECTION: This misconception is based on the idea of falsification, philosopher Karl Popper's influential account of scientific justification, which suggests that all science can do is reject, or falsify, hypotheses — that science cannot find evidence that one idea over others. Falsification was a popular philosophical doctrine — especially with scientists — but it was soon recognized that falsification wasn't a very complete or accurate picture of how scientific knowledge is built. In science, ideas can never be completely proved or completely disproved. Instead, science accepts or rejects ideas based on supporting and refuting evidence, and may revise those conclusions if warranted by new evidence or perspectives.

Hypotheses about the existence of electrons have been supported after countless tests using the scientific method.

24/02/2014 · Can you figure out the rule

However most subsets of the real numbers are so complicated that we can't describe them in a simple way. Not even if we extend the meaning of simple by a bit, and if we extend it even more, then not only we will lose the above result about the continuum hypothesis being true for simple sets; we will still not be able to cover even anything close to "a large portion" of the subsets.